Redirect Checker
Capture every hop and identify the exact redirect where the query string changes.
Открыть инструмент >Click ID troubleshooting
Google Ads clicks reach the landing page without gclid, so attribution, Smart Bidding, and offline match workflows lose a critical identifier.
This issue appears when the original Google Ads click contains gclid, but the landing page or downstream system no longer does. Traffic still arrives, but the identifier that ties the click to conversion data gets lost on the way.
The practical job is to prove where the parameter disappears, repair that owner, and retest with the exact launch URL. Treat this as a QA workflow, not a guessing exercise.
You usually see the business effect first and the technical cause second. Reporting quality drops, but the page still seems to work at first glance.
gclid, but the final landing URL does not.Most gclid loss happens because redirects rebuild the destination URL, landing pages enforce canonical paths without preserving parameters, or browser-side scripts rewrite the URL too early.
Google Ads did not usually remove the parameter on its own. The break is more often in your redirect or landing stack.
gclid even when the page receives it.Use the real production destination, not an edited or preview URL. You need evidence from the live path that paid traffic actually follows.
The core comparison is simple: original click URL, final landing URL, and stored downstream value.
Run the live URL through Redirect Checker and capture every redirect hop before the landing page resolves.
Open the resolved URL in UTM Decoder or Click ID Extractor and confirm whether gclid survived with the rest of the parameters.
Verify whether the landing page stores gclid in hidden fields, cookies, or browser storage before the visitor submits a form.
If the page keeps the value but CRM, analytics, or upload workflows do not, the redirect is only part of the story and the loss is happening later.
Repair the layer that strips the parameter, then retest the exact same production path until the final page and downstream systems preserve the identifier consistently.
If the redirect chain is also stripping UTM tags, use UTM parameters lost after redirect to fix the broader query-string problem.
Update redirect rules, CDN logic, vanity-domain forwarding, or tracker templates so they append the full incoming query string.
Delay canonicalization or browser-history cleanup until forms, analytics, and tracking scripts have captured the incoming values.
Map gclid into hidden fields, CRM fields, and any upload workflow so later systems do not depend on the browser URL still containing it.
Use UTM Builder for the canonical tagged template and compare the fixed result in UTM Decoder.
Rerun Redirect Checker and downstream validation until the same production URL preserves gclid from click to record.
This stack gives you the shortest path from suspicion to proof: trace the redirect chain, inspect the final URL, rebuild the launch template, and compare fixed versus broken paths.
If you discover that both gclid and UTMs disappear together, link the incident to UTM parameters lost after redirect so the team fixes the entire routing problem.
Capture every hop and identify the exact redirect where the query string changes.
Открыть инструмент >Inspect the final landing URL and compare the broken destination against the intended version.
Открыть инструмент >Rebuild one approved campaign template so teams stop publishing hand-edited URLs.
Открыть инструмент >Confirm whether gclid still exists on the final URL alongside UTMs and other identifiers.
Открыть инструмент >A strong fix means the redirect path is documented, the final landing page keeps gclid, and your downstream systems store the same value consistently.
FAQ
Yes. Google Ads can send the parameter correctly while a redirect rule, landing-page rewrite, or storage layer removes it later in the path.
No. You need the full redirect chain, because the useful answer is the exact hop where the parameter changes or disappears.
Then the break is likely in form handling, CRM mapping, middleware, or the offline-upload process rather than in the redirect itself.